Narrative Opinion Summary
The assignments of error filed by the defendant have been reviewed and found to lack reversible merit. These assignments do not raise any questions of unsettled law, thus no published explanation is warranted. They are addressed in an unpublished appendix that is publicly recorded. The convictions and sentences of the defendants are affirmed. Justice Edward A. de la Houssaye, III participated as an Associate Justice pro tempore in this decision.
Legal Issues Addressed
Affirmation of Convictions and Sentencessubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court affirmed the convictions and sentences of the defendants.
Reasoning: The convictions and sentences of the defendants are affirmed.
Participation of Justice Pro Temporesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Justice Edward A. de la Houssaye, III participated as an Associate Justice pro tempore in the decision.
Reasoning: Justice Edward A. de la Houssaye, III participated as an Associate Justice pro tempore in this decision.
Publication of Judicial Opinionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court decided that the assignments of error did not raise any questions of unsettled law, hence no published explanation was necessary.
Reasoning: These assignments do not raise any questions of unsettled law, thus no published explanation is warranted.
Review of Assignments of Errorsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court reviewed the assignments of error filed by the defendant and determined that they lacked reversible merit.
Reasoning: The assignments of error filed by the defendant have been reviewed and found to lack reversible merit.