You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

DTH Media Corp. v. Folt

Citation: 819 S.E.2d 376Docket: No. 142PA18

Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina; October 24, 2018; North Carolina; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

On October 24, 2018, the court granted two petitions filed by the Defendants: one for a Writ of Supersedeas regarding a judgment from the Court of Appeals, submitted on May 16, 2018, and another for discretionary review of the same decision, submitted on May 22, 2018. Both orders are certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals. The case is now officially docketed, and the parties are required to submit their briefs according to the timelines and procedures outlined in Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

Legal Issues Addressed

Appellate Procedure

Application: The parties involved in the case are required to submit their briefs following the procedures and timelines set forth in the appellate rules.

Reasoning: The case is now officially docketed, and the parties are required to submit their briefs according to the timelines and procedures outlined in Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

Discretionary Review

Application: The court accepted the Defendants' petition for discretionary review, deciding to re-evaluate the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Reasoning: ...and another for discretionary review of the same decision, submitted on May 22, 2018.

Writ of Supersedeas

Application: The court granted the Defendants' petition for a Writ of Supersedeas, temporarily halting the effect of a lower court's judgment pending further review.

Reasoning: On October 24, 2018, the court granted two petitions filed by the Defendants: one for a Writ of Supersedeas regarding a judgment from the Court of Appeals, submitted on May 16, 2018...