You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Planned Parenthood of the Blue Ridge Herbert C. Jones, Jr., M.D. Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington Virginia League for Planned Parenthood Hillcrest Clinic Richmond Medical Center for Women Thomas Gresinger, M.D. Commonwealth Women's Clinic Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Virginia v. James L. Camblos, in His Official Capacity as Commonwealth's Attorney for the County of Albemarle, and as a Representative of All the Commonwealth's Attorneys in Virginia

Citations: 125 F.3d 884; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 28867; 1997 WL 651170Docket: 97-1853

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; October 20, 1997; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, several Virginia physicians and advocacy groups challenged the enforcement of Virginia's Parental Notification Act, which requires parental notification or judicial approval before an abortion can be performed on an unemancipated minor. The law was set to take effect on July 1, 1997. Prior to this date, the plaintiffs sought and obtained a preliminary injunction from the Western District of Virginia to prevent the law's enforcement. In response, the Commonwealth filed for a stay, which was granted on June 30, 1997. During the appeal, the plaintiffs moved to vacate the stay, but the Court of Appeals, by a majority vote, denied this motion. Judges Wilkinson, Russell, Widener, Wilkins, Niemeyer, Luttig, and Williams voted to maintain the stay, while Judges Hall, Murnaghan, Ervin, Michael, and Motz opposed it. Judge Hamilton abstained from voting. The outcome preserved the stay on the preliminary injunction, allowing the Parental Notification Act to remain in effect pending further judicial review.

Legal Issues Addressed

Denial of Motion to Vacate Stay

Application: A motion to vacate the stay was denied by the Court of Appeals after a majority of judges voted against it, thereby maintaining the stay on the preliminary injunction.

Reasoning: The Court of Appeals conducted a poll, resulting in a majority of judges (Chief Judge Wilkinson, Judges Russell, Widener, Wilkins, Niemeyer, Luttig, and Williams) voting to deny the motion to vacate the stay, while Judges Hall, Murnaghan, Ervin, Michael, and Motz voted in favor. Judge Hamilton abstained. Consequently, the plaintiffs' motion to vacate the stay was denied.

Parental Notification Requirement for Abortion

Application: The case involves a legal challenge to Virginia's Parental Notification Act, which mandates that physicians notify a parent or guardian before performing an abortion on an unemancipated minor, unless judicial approval is obtained.

Reasoning: Virginia's Parental Notification Act, signed into law on March 22, 1997, restricts physicians from performing abortions on unemancipated minors unless a parent or guardian is notified within twenty-four hours or judicial approval is obtained.

Preliminary Injunction and Stay

Application: The district court initially granted a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of the Parental Notification Act, which was subsequently stayed by the Commonwealth's appeal.

Reasoning: Prior to the law taking effect on July 1, 1997, several Virginia physicians and advocacy groups filed a lawsuit in the Western District of Virginia seeking an injunction against the law's enforcement. The district court granted a preliminary injunction, prompting the Commonwealth to seek a stay, which was granted on June 30, 1997.