You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

JULIET MOYANO v. DAVID BOHORQUEZ, D.O.

Citation: Not availableDocket: 21-1950

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; July 28, 2022; Florida; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Juliet Moyano appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County, where she contested the ruling against her involving David Bohorquez, D.O., and North Broward Hospital District, operating as Broward Health Coral Springs. The appeal was reviewed by the District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida, Fourth District, which affirmed the lower court's decision. The ruling was issued on July 28, 2022, and the decision is not final until any timely filed motion for rehearing is resolved. Legal representation for Moyano included Michele K. Feinzig and Ramon Rubio, while Bohorquez and the hospital were represented by a team from Rissman, Barrett, Hurt, Donahue, McLain, Mangan, P.A., and Diane H. Tutt from Conroy Simberg. The appellate decision was per curiam, with Judges Klingensmith, Warner, and Conner concurring.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appellate Review and Affirmation of Lower Court Decision

Application: The District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida, Fourth District, reviewed the appeal and affirmed the lower court's decision.

Reasoning: The appeal was reviewed by the District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida, Fourth District, which affirmed the lower court's decision.

Finality of Appellate Decisions

Application: The appellate decision is not considered final until any timely filed motion for rehearing is resolved, indicating a procedural opportunity for further review.

Reasoning: The ruling was issued on July 28, 2022, and the decision is not final until any timely filed motion for rehearing is resolved.

Per Curiam Appellate Decisions

Application: The appellate decision was issued per curiam, meaning it was made by the court collectively without individual opinions from the judges.

Reasoning: The appellate decision was per curiam, with Judges Klingensmith, Warner, and Conner concurring.