You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Strickland v. 212 Corp of N.J.

Citations: 380 N.J. Super. 248; 881 A.2d 803; 2005 N.J. Super. LEXIS 272

Court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division; May 2, 2005; New Jersey; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

This case concerns the application of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23b, which requires a child support judgment search before distributing settlement funds from civil litigation in New Jersey. The plaintiff, a North Carolina resident, settled a personal injury claim in New Jersey but had child support arrears in North Carolina. A search conducted by the plaintiff’s attorney revealed no New Jersey judgments, prompting a request for distribution of the settlement. The defendants argued for enforcement of the North Carolina obligation in New Jersey. Following a hearing, the court delayed proceedings to involve North Carolina child support authorities, who confirmed outstanding arrears. However, given the absence of a New Jersey docketed judgment or Notice of Interstate Lien, the court ruled distribution permissible under the statute, provided it occurred within thirty days of the search. The case also references N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, highlighting the enforceability of child support judgments from other states if properly docketed. The court emphasized the need for legislative review to better protect child support beneficiaries across jurisdictions. Ultimately, the statute was interpreted to allow the distribution based on New Jersey search results, as no local judgment was found.

Legal Issues Addressed

Enforceability of Out-of-State Child Support Judgments

Application: Only judgments docketed in New Jersey or accompanied by a Notice of Interstate Lien are enforceable, affecting the distribution of settlement proceeds.

Reasoning: For judgments from other states to be enforceable in New Jersey, they must either be docketed or accompanied by a Notice of Interstate Lien.

Interpretation of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23b

Application: The statute mandates child support judgment searches before distributing civil litigation settlement funds, allowing distribution if no judgments are found in New Jersey.

Reasoning: The opinion addresses the interpretation of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23b, the child support lien statute, which mandates child support judgment searches before distributing funds from civil litigation settlements.

Legislative Intent and Statutory Gaps

Application: The statute's current implementation lacks mechanisms to protect obligations accrued in other states, indicating potential legislative review might be necessary.

Reasoning: The document highlights broader issues regarding the statute's application, indicating a need for potential legislative review to protect child support beneficiaries.

Procedural Requirements under N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23b

Application: The statute requires a judgment search through a designated service, and if no New Jersey judgment is found, distribution is allowed without considering out-of-state obligations.

Reasoning: Specific procedural steps are required: the prevailing party must provide their personal details, and the attorney must initiate a search through a private judgment service.

Timing for Reliance on Child Support Searches

Application: The court determined a thirty-day period for reliance on child support searches before distributing settlement funds, balancing prompt distribution and administrative practicality.

Reasoning: The court deemed this excessive, settling on a thirty-day period.