You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Fedway Associates Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation

Citations: 282 N.J. Super. 129; 659 A.2d 536; 15 N.J. Tax 203; 1995 N.J. Super. LEXIS 215

Court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division; June 23, 1995; New Jersey; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In the case of Fedway Associates, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation, the Tax Court determined that Fedway Associates, Inc., operating within an urban enterprise zone, was not eligible for a use tax exemption for purchases made for employee incentive and marketing programs. The case focused on whether items such as corkscrews, napkins, calendars, golf bags, and home electronics, purchased by Fedway, qualified for tax exemption under N.J.S.A. 52:27H-79. Following an audit of transactions from 1986 to 1989, the Division of Taxation assessed Fedway with $93,736.98 in use tax and $47,818.28 in interest. Fedway appealed, arguing that the Tax Court misinterpreted the Urban Enterprise Zones Act's provisions. The appellate court upheld the Tax Court's decision, concurring with Judge Lasser's interpretation of the statute and concluding that the facts were sufficiently detailed in the lower court's opinion. Consequently, Fedway was held liable for the total amount of $141,555.26, inclusive of tax and interest.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appellate Review and Affirmation

Application: The appellate court affirmed the Tax Court's decision, endorsing Judge Lasser's rationale and finding no need for further elaboration.

Reasoning: The appellate court affirmed the Tax Court's findings, agreeing with Judge Lasser's rationale, and noted that the facts were adequately detailed in the original opinion, thus not requiring extensive elaboration in their ruling.

Interpretation of the Urban Enterprise Zones Act

Application: The appellate court agreed with the Tax Court's interpretation that the statute did not extend tax exemptions to Fedway's purchases related to employee incentives.

Reasoning: On appeal, Fedway contended that the Tax Court misinterpreted provisions of the Urban Enterprise Zones Act regarding its employee incentive programs.

Use Tax Exemption under the Urban Enterprise Zones Act

Application: The court determined that purchases for employee incentive and marketing programs do not qualify for a use tax exemption under the Urban Enterprise Zones Act.

Reasoning: The court ruled that items such as corkscrews, napkins, calendars, golf bags, and home electronics do not qualify for the exemption under N.J.S.A. 52:27H-79.