You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Carteret Savings & Loan Ass'n, F.A. v. Davis

Citations: 200 N.J. Super. 167; 491 A.2d 5; 1985 N.J. Super. LEXIS 1237

Court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division; March 26, 1985; New Jersey; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

This case concerns an appeal from a Chancery Division order that allowed the redemption of a property sold at a sheriff's sale following the foreclosure of a first mortgage. The core issue was whether the purchaser at a junior lien foreclosure sale could exercise redemption rights against a senior lien. Carteret Savings, Loan Association held the first mortgage and was not initially involved in the foreclosure of the second mortgage by The Money Store. However, complications arose when The Money Store, after acquiring title from a sheriff's sale, attempted to redeem the property after a subsequent sale by Carteret. The court, affirming Judge Cohen's decision, recognized that redemption rights are transferable and apply to successors of the mortgagor's interest, including those acquiring title through judicial sales. The court cited R. 4:65-5 and prior case law to support the ten-day redemption period's applicability to fee title holders. Ultimately, the court upheld the order directing the return of the purchase price to Constance Silakoski and marking the writ of execution as satisfied by redemption, emphasizing the protection against forfeiture and the continuation of redemption rights in complex foreclosure situations.

Legal Issues Addressed

Precedent on Successor's Redemption Rights

Application: The court relied on precedent to determine that successors to the mortgagor's interest, including purchasers at judicial sales, inherit redemption rights.

Reasoning: In Norfolk Building & Loan Ass’n v. Stern, it is established that anyone succeeding to the mortgagor's interest, including purchasers at judicial sales, inherits the right of redemption.

Priority and Participation in Foreclosure Proceedings

Application: Despite not being a party to the second mortgage foreclosure, the first mortgagee's rights were preserved, and the purchaser at the second mortgage foreclosure sale could redeem against the first mortgage.

Reasoning: Carteret was not a party to the second mortgage foreclosure, but The Money Store was involved in Carteret's later action.

Right of Redemption in Foreclosure Sales

Application: The court held that the right of redemption extends to the fee title holder at a sheriff’s sale following a junior lien foreclosure, allowing the purchaser to redeem the property from a senior lien.

Reasoning: Judge Cohen concluded that the 10-day redemption period outlined in R. 4:65-5 protects against forfeitures and applies equally to the fee title holder, as seen in past rulings.

Transferability of Redemption Rights

Application: The court affirmed that redemption rights are transferable, and the purchaser at a foreclosure sale inherits the rights of both the mortgagee and the mortgagor involved.

Reasoning: The court emphasized that the right of redemption is transferable and the purchaser at a foreclosure sale gains the rights of both the mortgagee and mortgagor involved.