Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
72 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1096, 72 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1764, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1118 the Coalition for Economic Equity California Naacp Northern California Naacp California Labor Federation Afl-Cio Council of Asian American Business Associations, California Chinese American Citizens' Alliance Women Construction Business Owners and Executives, California Chapter United Minority Business Entrepreneurs Chinese for Affirmative Action Black Advocates in State Service Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance La Voz Chicana Black Chamber of Commerce of California Michele Bennett Nancy Burns Floyd Chavez Christopher Clay Dana Cunningham Iran Celeste Davila Shevade Dove, Nfr Melodie Dove Jessica Lopez Virginia Mosqueda Salvador Ochoa Clifford Tong v. Pete Wilson, Governor Daniel E. Lundgren, Attorney General for the State of California Joanne Corday Kozberg, Secretary of State and Consumer Services Agency and Cabinet Member James Gomez, Dir Dept of Corr, and Californians Against Discrimination and Preferenc
Citation: 107 F.3d 704Docket: 97-15030
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; February 9, 1997; Federal Appellate Court
The case involves multiple plaintiffs, including various civil rights organizations and individuals, against defendants including California's Governor, Attorney General, Secretary of State, and the Director of the Department of Corrections, along with an intervenor, Californians Against Discrimination and Preferences, Inc. The appeal concerns a preliminary injunction related to issues of economic equity and affirmative action in California. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an order deferring the motion from the defendant-intervenor for a stay of the preliminary injunction, pending further court decisions. The court confirmed it would retain jurisdiction over the merits of the case and expedite the briefing schedule. Plaintiffs must submit their answering brief by February 21, 1997, while the defendants and the intervenor are to file their reply briefs by February 28, 1997. The court indicated that further oral arguments may be scheduled if deemed necessary.