Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Bishop v. Grievance Committee for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Citations: 178 L. Ed. 2d 282; 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7878; 131 S. Ct. 499; 562 U.S. 957; 79 U.S.L.W. 3227Docket: No. 10-5710
Court: Supreme Court of the United States; October 12, 2010; Federal Supreme Court; Federal Appellate Court
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by the petitioner is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is dismissed in accordance with Rule 39.8. The Court has determined that the petitioner has repeatedly abused its process, prompting the Clerk to not accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from the petitioner unless the required docketing fee, as stated in Rule 38(a), is paid and the petition complies with Rule 33.1. This decision references the precedent set in Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992), with the same case previously noted at 360 Fed. Appx. 246.