You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. DFRF Enters. LLC

Citation: 384 F. Supp. 3d 129Docket: Civil Action No. 15-12857-PBS

Court: District Court, District of Columbia; May 29, 2019; Federal District Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) initiated enforcement actions against DFRF Enterprises, a deceptive gold mining company implicated in a pyramid scheme. The scheme, orchestrated by Daniel Fernandes Rojo Filho, misled over 1,400 investors with false claims about gold mine ownership and financial returns, raising over $15 million while returning only $1.6 million. The proceedings were stayed from October 2015 to November 2018 pending a criminal prosecution. Upon resumption, the SEC sought defaults against DFRF Massachusetts and DFRF Florida for procedural breaches. The Court found DFRF Enterprises in violation of Sections 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act. The Court ordered disgorgement of $15,291,689 plus prejudgment interest and imposed civil penalties of $775,000 on each entity, addressing unresolved questions concerning joint and several liability for such penalties in the First Circuit. The SEC was required to submit a modified judgment order in line with the Court's findings.

Legal Issues Addressed

Imposition of Disgorgement and Civil Penalties

Application: The Court ordered disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and imposed civil penalties on DFRF Enterprises for their fraudulent activities.

Reasoning: The Court granted these requests, ordering disgorgement of $15,291,689 plus prejudgment interest of $2,636,463, making both DFRF entities jointly and severally liable. Each entity was also ordered to pay a civil penalty of $775,000.

Joint and Several Liability in SEC Actions

Application: The Court addressed the issue of joint and several liability for civil penalties, which remains unresolved in the First Circuit.

Reasoning: The Court noted the uncertainty regarding joint and several liability for civil penalties under SEC enforcement actions, as this issue remains unresolved in the First Circuit.

SEC Enforcement Action and Pyramid Schemes

Application: The SEC pursued enforcement against DFRF Enterprises for operating a pyramid scheme, which involved significant misrepresentations to investors.

Reasoning: The SEC's complaint alleges that DFRF Enterprises, organized by Daniel Fernandes Rojo Filho, operated as a classic pyramid scheme from June 2014 to June 2015, misleading investors about ownership of gold mines, production rates, financial guarantees, and charitable donations.

Violation of Securities Laws

Application: The Court determined that DFRF Enterprises violated several securities laws, including the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Securities Act of 1933.

Reasoning: The Court found that DFRF Enterprises violated multiple securities laws, including Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act.