You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Empire Med. Review Servs., Inc. v. CompuClaim, Inc.

Citation: 326 F. Supp. 3d 685Docket: Case No. 13–CV–1283

Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin; June 26, 2018; Federal District Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In a dispute between two software companies, Empire Medical Review Systems and CompuClaim, the central issues involved allegations of breach of contract, copyright infringement, and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Empire, which developed medical billing software, accused CompuClaim of breaching their License Agreement by failing to pay fees and making unauthorized use of the CMWebSite source code. CompuClaim counterclaimed that Empire had materially breached the agreements first. As the case progressed, Empire amended its complaint to include DMCA violations, alleging improper removal of copyright management information. The court's analysis focused on whether genuine disputes of material fact existed, particularly regarding the existence and scope of an implied license allowing CompuClaim to use the software. The court denied summary judgment motions from both parties on most issues, except confirming the five-year extension of the License Agreement. While CompuClaim's counterclaims were dismissed following a settlement, the court found unresolved questions regarding the implied license and potential copyright infringement, precluding a resolution through summary judgment. Empire's claims regarding the extension of the License Agreement were upheld, maintaining the legal battle for further proceedings.

Legal Issues Addressed

Application of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)

Application: Empire Medical Review Systems updated its software to comply with HIPAA's new electronic transaction standards, leading to the development of ClearingMagic.

Reasoning: Following the enactment of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in 1996, the healthcare industry was required to comply with new electronic transaction standards by approximately 2003.

Breach of Contract and License Agreement

Application: Empire alleged that CompuClaim breached their License Agreement by failing to pay license fees and violating other provisions after receiving the CMWebSite source code.

Reasoning: Empire filed a lawsuit on November 13, 2013, alleging multiple breaches of the License Agreement by CompuClaim, including failure to pay license fees.

Contractual Settlement and Release of Claims

Application: The court concluded that the mutual release did not bar Empire's claims as CompuClaim could not prove that post-settlement actions were precluded.

Reasoning: The court concludes that CompuClaim has not established that Empire's copyright claim was released by the mutual release executed on April 16, 2012.

Copyright Infringement under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)

Application: Empire claimed that CompuClaim's alteration of the CMWebSite source code violated the DMCA's provisions on copyright management information.

Reasoning: Empire claims each of the 149 instances of name changes by Berg constitutes a DMCA violation, potentially subjecting CompuClaim to statutory damages ranging from $2,500 to $25,000 per violation.

Implied License in Copyright Law

Application: CompuClaim was found to have an implied license to use the CMWebSite source code, despite the absence of an express transfer of copyright ownership.

Reasoning: Despite the absence of an explicit license or copyright transfer, CompuClaim does have an implied license to use the CMWebSite source code, although this does not permit unrestricted use of the software.

Summary Judgment Standards under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56(a)

Application: Both parties moved for summary judgment, with the court analyzing whether any genuine disputes of material fact existed.

Reasoning: Summary judgment is granted when the movant demonstrates no genuine dispute exists regarding any material fact and is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, according to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a).