You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Tully v. Department of Justice

Citation: 58 F. App'x 501Docket: No. 02-3396

Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; March 4, 2003; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The case involves an appeal by a former Correctional Officer, who alleged discrimination and retaliation by a federal agency under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA). Initially, the appellant settled a dispute with the agency, agreeing to resign while receiving administrative leave. When his applications for new positions were not processed, he claimed this was retaliation for his USERRA claims. An administrative judge ruled that the agency's failure to process the applications was indeed influenced by his prior USERRA appeals and ordered the agency to review them within 20 days. Both the appellant and the agency sought review from the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), but due to a lack of consensus among Board members, the administrative judge's decision stood. The MSPB confirmed the agency must process the applications but denied the appellant's request for reinstatement and back pay, as the ordered corrective action was deemed sufficient. The appellant's jurisdiction was recognized under 38 U.S.C. 4324, and the case outcome was affirmed, directing the agency to act on his applications as per the initial order.

Legal Issues Addressed

Corrective Action for USERRA Violations

Application: The agency is required to process Tully's applications for employment positions because the failure to do so was found to be influenced by his prior USERRA appeals.

Reasoning: An administrative judge found that the agency's failure to process his applications was influenced by his prior USERRA appeals and ordered the agency to review his applications within 20 days.

Finality of Administrative Judge's Decision

Application: Due to a lack of consensus among the Board members, the administrative judge's decision granting corrective action to Tully became final.

Reasoning: Tully and the agency both petitioned the Board for review, but due to a lack of consensus among the two Board members, the judge's decision became final.

Jurisdiction under USERRA

Application: The Merit Systems Protection Board has jurisdiction over claims brought under USERRA against federal agencies, and such decisions can be appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Reasoning: Jurisdiction over Mr. Tully’s appeal is established under 38 U.S.C. 4324, which allows individuals with USERRA claims to file complaints against Federal executive agencies directly to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB).

Scope of Relief under USERRA

Application: The Board affirmed that Tully is not entitled to reinstatement or back pay, as the corrective action ordered sufficiently addressed the USERRA violation.

Reasoning: Although Mr. Tully claimed retaliation for the agency's failure to process his applications for Correctional Officer positions, the Board found in his favor, requiring the agency to process those applications. This corrective action fulfills his entitlement, and he is not owed employment or back pay at this stage.