You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

United States v. Acevedo

Citation: 47 F. App'x 603Docket: Docket No. 01-1204

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; October 4, 2002; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The case involves an appeal by the defendant, Gutierrez, from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Gutierrez was sentenced to seventy months’ imprisonment, followed by four years of supervised release, and a special assessment, after entering a guilty plea with a waiver of rights to request a downward departure or to appeal a sentence of 120 months or less. He sought an evidentiary hearing for substantial assistance offered to state law enforcement, which he claimed warranted a reduction under U.S.S.G. 5K2.0. However, the district court found his information inconsistent and unhelpful, denying the hearing. On appeal, Gutierrez argued that his alleged assistance should invalidate the waiver, but the appellate court upheld the district court's decision, affirming the enforceability of the waiver since it was made knowingly and voluntarily. The appeal was dismissed for want of merit in Gutierrez's arguments and for not demonstrating any clear error or abuse of discretion by the lower court.

Legal Issues Addressed

Denial of Evidentiary Hearing

Application: The court denied Gutierrez's request for an evidentiary hearing based on a lack of evidence showing that his assistance was substantial and consistent, thereby not constituting an abuse of discretion.

Reasoning: Gutierrez argued on appeal that his assistance nullified the waiver of his procedural rights; however, the court found that he did not present evidence to show clear error in the district court's findings or an abuse of discretion in denying the hearing.

Downward Departure under U.S.S.G. 5K2.0

Application: Gutierrez's request for a downward departure was denied because the information he provided was inconsistent and unhelpful, failing to meet the criteria for substantial assistance.

Reasoning: The district court investigated Gutierrez's eligibility for a downward departure and ultimately determined that he did not assist state law enforcement authorities, denying his request for an evidentiary hearing.

Enforceability of Waiver of Appeal Rights

Application: The court enforced Gutierrez's waiver of his right to appeal a sentence of 120 months or less, which was part of his plea agreement, as it was deemed knowing and voluntary.

Reasoning: Notably, the court upheld that a knowing and voluntary waiver of the right to appeal a sentence within an agreed guideline range is enforceable.