Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
United States v. Najera
Citation: 46 F. App'x 512Docket: No. 01-10011; D.C. No. CR-95-00457-MHP
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; September 18, 2002; Federal Appellate Court
Pablo Felipe Najera appeals his conviction and sentence for possession and distribution of methamphetamine under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). His attorney has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel, referencing Anders v. California, indicating that no nonfrivolous issues for review can be identified. An independent review of the record confirms that Najera knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and received a sentence consistent with his plea agreement. Consequently, the court enforces the waiver and dismisses the appeal, referencing United States v. Martinez to support the decision. The attorney's motion to withdraw is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. This ruling is not intended for publication and cannot be cited in other cases within this circuit, as per Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.