You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Ross v. Pendell

Citation: 46 F. App'x 155Docket: No. 02-6727

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; September 5, 2002; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

Kevin Leroy Ross appeals the district court's decision denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. After reviewing the record and the district court's opinion, the appellate court found no reversible error. The court affirms the district court's reasoning in the case of Ross v. Pendell, No. CA-00-182 (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2002). Oral argument was deemed unnecessary, as the facts and legal arguments are sufficiently presented in the submitted materials. The decision is affirmed.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appellate Review of District Court Decision

Application: The appellate court reviews the district court's decision and finds no reversible error, thereby affirming the decision without further oral argument.

Reasoning: The appellate court found no reversible error. The court affirms the district court's reasoning in the case of Ross v. Pendell, No. CA-00-182 (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2002).

Oral Argument Unnecessary for Appeal

Application: The appellate court determines that oral argument is unnecessary due to the sufficient presentation of facts and legal arguments in the submitted materials.

Reasoning: Oral argument was deemed unnecessary, as the facts and legal arguments are sufficiently presented in the submitted materials.