Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
United States v. Renteria
Citation: 44 F. App'x 858Docket: No. 01-50663; D.C. No. CR-01-00306-NAJ
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; August 19, 2002; Federal Appellate Court
Mario Renteria appeals his conviction and sentence for being a deported alien found in the United States, violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326. His attorney submitted a brief under Anders v. California, indicating that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal, and has requested to withdraw from representation. Renteria did not file a supplemental brief on his own behalf. An independent review of the record, as mandated by Penson v. Ohio, found no arguable issues. Consequently, the court granted the attorney's motion to withdraw and affirmed Renteria's conviction and sentence. The decision is not to be published and cannot be cited in future cases except as allowed by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.