Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Cannon v. Swindell
Citation: 34 F. App'x 905Docket: No. 02-1077
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; May 6, 2002; Federal Appellate Court
Haywood Allen Cannon's appeal against the district court's order, which denied relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 complaint, has been reviewed. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's opinion, which accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation. The decision is affirmed based on the district court's reasoning in Cannon v. Swindell, No. CA-01-82-7-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 17, 2001). Oral argument was deemed unnecessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were sufficiently addressed in the submitted materials.