You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

In re Gupta

Citation: 123 N.E.3d 696Docket: Supreme Court Case No. 19S-DI-71

Court: Indiana Supreme Court; June 18, 2019; Indiana; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

A Verified Emergency Petition for Interim Suspension has been filed by the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission against the Respondent, seeking immediate suspension from legal practice due to alleged misconduct that could pose a significant risk to the public and the administration of justice. The Respondent agrees that an interim suspension is appropriate but requests a short delay before it takes effect. The Court, after consideration, grants the petition and imposes an immediate suspension from the practice of law, which will remain in effect until further notice or until the disciplinary proceedings are concluded. The Respondent is also instructed to comply with the responsibilities of a suspended attorney as outlined in Admission and Discipline Rule 23(26). All Justices have concurred with this decision.

Legal Issues Addressed

Agreement to Interim Suspension by Respondent

Application: The Respondent agrees to the interim suspension but requests a delay in its effective date.

Reasoning: The Respondent agrees that an interim suspension is appropriate but requests a short delay before it takes effect.

Compliance with Responsibilities of a Suspended Attorney

Application: The Respondent is required to comply with specific responsibilities outlined in the applicable disciplinary rules for suspended attorneys.

Reasoning: The Respondent is also instructed to comply with the responsibilities of a suspended attorney as outlined in Admission and Discipline Rule 23(26).

Immediate Effect of Court's Order

Application: The court orders that the interim suspension take immediate effect, overriding the Respondent's request for a delay.

Reasoning: The Court, after consideration, grants the petition and imposes an immediate suspension from the practice of law, which will remain in effect until further notice or until the disciplinary proceedings are concluded.

Interim Suspension of Attorney

Application: The court grants an interim suspension when there is an alleged misconduct posing a significant risk to the public and the administration of justice.

Reasoning: A Verified Emergency Petition for Interim Suspension has been filed by the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission against the Respondent, seeking immediate suspension from legal practice due to alleged misconduct that could pose a significant risk to the public and the administration of justice.

Unanimous Concurrence of Justices

Application: All members of the court agree with the decision to impose an immediate suspension.

Reasoning: All Justices have concurred with this decision.