You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

In re Failure to Comply With Continuing Legal Educ. Requirements, Nonpayment of Attorney Registration Fees, &/or Failure to Submit Iolta Certification

Citation: 99 N.E.3d 240Docket: Supreme Court Case No. 18S–MS–306

Court: Indiana Supreme Court; June 7, 2018; Indiana; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The judicial opinion provides a comprehensive listing of attorneys and their professional obligations across various counties in Indiana and other states. It primarily focuses on the attorneys' compliance with Interest on Lawyers' Trust Accounts (IOLTA) and Continuing Legal Education (CLE) requirements. The document categorizes attorneys based on their association with either or both types of fees, reflecting the legal community's adherence to financial and educational standards. Notable entries include attorneys from Indiana counties such as Adams, Allen, and Marion, as well as individuals from states like Ohio, Missouri, and California, indicating the broad geographic spread of legal professionals. The document serves as a record of the attorneys' identification numbers, names, addresses, and the nature of their financial obligations or educational credits. Overall, this opinion underscores the regulatory framework governing attorneys' financial and educational responsibilities, emphasizing the importance of maintaining compliance with IOLTA and CLE standards.

Legal Issues Addressed

Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Obligations

Application: The document details the necessity for attorneys to fulfill CLE credits, showcasing a commitment to ongoing legal education as an aspect of professional compliance.

Reasoning: The document lists individuals associated with various fees and Continuing Legal Education (CLE) credits, primarily in Indianapolis, Indiana, and surrounding areas.

Geographical Distribution of Legal Professionals

Application: The document highlights the widespread geographical distribution of legal professionals and their compliance responsibilities across multiple states.

Reasoning: Notably, entries vary in location across multiple states, including California, Virginia, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, and others, reflecting a wide geographic distribution of legal professionals.

Interest on Lawyers' Trust Accounts (IOLTA) Requirements

Application: The document outlines various attorneys' obligations concerning IOLTA fees, indicating a regulatory requirement for attorneys to maintain such accounts.

Reasoning: The document lists various individuals along with their addresses and associated legal designations, primarily focusing on fees related to IOLTA (Interest on Lawyers' Trust Accounts).