Narrative Opinion Summary
In the case of Kriscuinas v. Union Underwear Company and others, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the decision of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The case, numbered 93-cv-04216, involved Karen Kriscuinas, represented by her parents Anthony and Mary Louis Kriscuinas, against multiple defendants including Union Underwear Company, Bradlees Inc., Stop & Shop Companies, Winterland Productions, Big Step Productions, and Chestnut Hill Marketing Co. The appellate court's ruling was issued on March 26, 1996, and upheld the lower court's findings without any modifications or reversals.
Legal Issues Addressed
Affirmation of Lower Court's Decisionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court affirmed the decision of the lower court, indicating agreement with the findings and conclusions reached by the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Reasoning: The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the decision of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Jurisdiction of Appellate Reviewsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The case was reviewed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, demonstrating the court's jurisdiction over appeals from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Reasoning: The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the decision of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.