Narrative Opinion Summary
Plaintiffs-appellants, former employees of Lucky/American Stores’ Fullerton warehouse, appeal three rulings: (1) the denial of their motion to file a second amended complaint, (2) the grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants, and (3) the defendants' awarded attorney’s fees. The appellate court holds jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1291 and affirms the district court's decisions as outlined in its orders dated October 27, 1999, November 9, 1999, and January 24, 2000. The court specifies that this disposition is not to be published and cannot be cited in future cases within the circuit, except as allowed by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Legal Issues Addressed
Award of Attorney’s Fees to Defendantssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court validated the district court's decision to award attorney's fees to the defendants, as part of the appellate review process.
Reasoning: Plaintiffs-appellants, former employees of Lucky/American Stores’ Fullerton warehouse, appeal three rulings: ... and (3) the defendants' awarded attorney’s fees.
Denial of Motion to File Second Amended Complaintsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court reviewed and upheld the district court's decision to deny the plaintiffs' motion to amend their complaint for a second time.
Reasoning: Plaintiffs-appellants, former employees of Lucky/American Stores’ Fullerton warehouse, appeal three rulings: (1) the denial of their motion to file a second amended complaint...
Jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1291subscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court asserts its authority to review the decisions of the lower court under the statute granting jurisdiction for appeals from final decisions of district courts.
Reasoning: The appellate court holds jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1291 and affirms the district court's decisions as outlined in its orders dated October 27, 1999, November 9, 1999, and January 24, 2000.
Non-Publication and Citation Restriction under Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3subscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court's disposition in this case is designated as non-precedential and restricted from citation in future cases, except as permitted by specific circuit rules.
Reasoning: The court specifies that this disposition is not to be published and cannot be cited in future cases within the circuit, except as allowed by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Summary Judgment in Favor of Defendantssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling granting summary judgment to the defendants, indicating that there were no genuine disputes of material fact requiring a trial.
Reasoning: Plaintiffs-appellants, former employees of Lucky/American Stores’ Fullerton warehouse, appeal three rulings: ... (2) the grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants...