Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
IDM Participating Income Co.II v. IDM Participating Income Corp.
Citation: 10 F. App'x 515Docket: No. 01-55279; D.C. No. CV-00-12368-DT
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; May 21, 2001; Federal Appellate Court
The Ninth Circuit reviewed an appeal regarding a preliminary injunction under Rule 3-3, with jurisdiction established by 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). The court's review focused on whether the district court abused its discretion, applied an incorrect legal standard, or made clearly erroneous factual findings. The record indicated that the district court did not rely on an erroneous legal premise and did not abuse its discretion in granting the injunction. The factual findings made by the district court were also not deemed clearly erroneous. Consequently, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's order. The court noted that this disposition is not suitable for publication and cannot be cited in other cases, except as permitted by Rule 36-3.