Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Zubkis v. Shasky
Citation: 7 F. App'x 603Docket: No. 99-56533; D.C. No. CV-99-1166-JNK(CGA)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; March 21, 2001; Federal Appellate Court
Vladislav Steven Zubkis appeals the district court's order that dismissed his case due to lack of jurisdiction. The appellate court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and reviews the dismissal de novo. The court interprets the district court’s August 23, 1999, order as a dismissal with prejudice for the entire case. It affirms the dismissal, concluding that the district court correctly determined there was no federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and that Zubkis did not establish diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The disposition is not intended for publication and cannot be cited except as permitted by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. The panel finds the case suitable for decision without oral argument.