You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Sparky's Waterfront Saloon, Inc. v. Cosmopolitan, Inc., H.E. Lockhart Management, Inc., Lockhart Development Corp., Arthur Witty, Arthur Witty Real Estate, St. Thomas Historical Trust, Inc. Dejongh Associates, Robert C. Dejongh, Armour Enterprises, Inc., Topa Equities, (Vi) Ltd

Citations: 74 F.3d 1227; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 38489Docket: 95-7124

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit; December 7, 1995; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

Sparky's Waterfront Saloon, Inc. v. Cosmopolitan, Inc. involves an appeal decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on December 8, 1995. The case, originating from the District Court of the Virgin Islands (D.V.I. No. 91-00059), was presided over by Judge Fullam. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision, maintaining the ruling without changes. The involved parties include Sparky's Waterfront Saloon, Inc. and various corporate entities and individuals such as Cosmopolitan, H.E. Lockhart Management, Lockhart Development Corp., Arthur Witty, and others. The summary does not provide details on the underlying issues or claims of the case, as the focus is solely on the judicial outcome and parties involved.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appellate Review and Affirmation

Application: The appellate court reviewed the decision of the lower court and upheld the ruling without any modifications.

Reasoning: The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision, maintaining the ruling without changes.

Jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Application: The case was reviewed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, indicating its jurisdiction over appeals from the District Court of the Virgin Islands.

Reasoning: Sparky's Waterfront Saloon, Inc. v. Cosmopolitan, Inc. involves an appeal decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on December 8, 1995.

Presiding Judge's Role in District Court Decision

Application: The case was originally decided by Judge Fullam in the District Court of the Virgin Islands, whose decision was under review in the appeal.

Reasoning: The case, originating from the District Court of the Virgin Islands (D.V.I. No. 91-00059), was presided over by Judge Fullam.