Narrative Opinion Summary
The case involves Carl R. Christy as the appellant against various government officials, including Assistant Attorneys General and an FBI Special Agent, as appellees. It addresses an appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit concerning the denial of requests for a rehearing en banc. The appellant sought further review of an earlier decision by a three-judge panel, but the court confirmed the denial of such requests on December 18, 1995, thereby upholding the panel's decision. The procedural posture of the case emphasizes the intricacies of appellate litigation, highlighting the difficulties in securing en banc reviews in the Eleventh Circuit. The court's determination underscores the rigorous legal standards employed in deciding whether to revisit prior panel decisions, referencing previous case law, specifically 66 F.3d 341, to contextualize the denial. The outcome leaves the appellant without the opportunity for full court reconsideration, reinforcing the finality of the panel's judgment in this appellate context.
Legal Issues Addressed
Appellate Litigation Procedures in the Eleventh Circuitsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The case illustrates the procedural aspects of appellate litigation, particularly the challenges in obtaining further review of a decision from a three-judge panel within the context of the Eleventh Circuit.
Reasoning: The document is significant as it illustrates the procedural aspects of appellate litigation, particularly the challenges in obtaining further review of a decision from a three-judge panel within the context of the Eleventh Circuit.
Denial of Rehearing En Bancsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court's decision confirms the denial of the rehearing en banc, indicating that the full court will not reconsider the panel's earlier decision.
Reasoning: The court's decision, dated December 18, 1995, confirms the denial of the rehearing en banc, meaning that the full court will not reconsider the panel's earlier decision.
Legal Standards for Granting Rehearing En Bancsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court reflects on the legal standards and considerations that are evaluated when determining whether to grant a rehearing en banc.
Reasoning: It reflects the legal standards and considerations that courts evaluate when determining whether to grant a rehearing en banc.