You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Roger Dale Grubb v. L. Wayne Moore, Superintendent Attorney General of North Carolina

Citations: 72 F.3d 126; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39544; 1995 WL 739383Docket: 95-6536

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; December 13, 1995; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

Roger Dale Grubb, the petitioner-appellant, sought to appeal a district court's order that denied relief on his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeal was reviewed by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which found no reversible error in the district court’s decision, which had accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation. Consequently, the Appeals Court denied Grubb a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The court also denied Grubb's request for oral argument, determining that the facts and legal issues were sufficiently presented in the written materials. Additionally, Grubb's motion to proceed in forma pauperis was denied. The appeal was dismissed without further proceedings.

Legal Issues Addressed

Denial of Certificate of Probable Cause

Application: The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the petitioner a certificate of probable cause to appeal, indicating that the court found no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

Reasoning: Consequently, the Appeals Court denied Grubb a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case, agreeing with the district court's reasoning.

Denial of Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

Application: The appellate court denied the petitioner’s motion to proceed without the prepayment of fees, indicating a lack of merit in the appeal.

Reasoning: Additionally, Grubb's motion to proceed in forma pauperis was denied.

Denial of Oral Argument

Application: The court determined that oral argument was unnecessary as the written briefs and records adequately presented the facts and legal contentions.

Reasoning: The court also denied Grubb's request for oral argument, determining that the facts and legal issues were sufficiently presented in the written materials.

Dismissal of Habeas Corpus Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Application: The district court's denial of relief on the habeas corpus petition was upheld by the Fourth Circuit, which found no reversible error in the lower court's decision.

Reasoning: Roger Dale Grubb, the petitioner-appellant, sought to appeal a district court's order that denied relief on his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.