You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Davis v. Monroe Cty. Board of Ed.

Citation: Not availableDocket: 94-9121

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit; February 13, 1996; Federal Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has reversed the judgment of the district court in the case of Aurelia Davis, as Next Friend of LaShonda D., against the Monroe County Board of Education, following a remand from the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court's ruling in Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education established significant legal precedent relevant to this case. Consequently, the Eleventh Circuit remands the case for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's decision. Chief Judge R. Lanier Anderson recused himself from participating in the decision.

Legal Issues Addressed

Application of Supreme Court Precedent

Application: The case is remanded for further proceedings that align with the legal principles established by the Supreme Court in its ruling.

Reasoning: Consequently, the Eleventh Circuit remands the case for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's decision.

Judicial Recusal

Application: Chief Judge R. Lanier Anderson did not participate in the decision due to recusal.

Reasoning: Chief Judge R. Lanier Anderson recused himself from participating in the decision.

Reversal of District Court Judgment

Application: The Eleventh Circuit reversed the district court's judgment in accord with the Supreme Court's precedent.

Reasoning: The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has reversed the judgment of the district court in the case of Aurelia Davis, as Next Friend of LaShonda D., against the Monroe County Board of Education, following a remand from the Supreme Court.