Narrative Opinion Summary
Appellant's commitment as a mentally ill person for up to 180 days is under review. She contends that there is insufficient evidence to prove she poses a danger to herself due to a mental disorder. The state agrees, acknowledging that the evidence does not meet the clear and convincing standard required for involuntary commitment. Consequently, the judgment is reversed.
Legal Issues Addressed
Reversal of Commitment Due to Insufficient Evidencesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: When the state acknowledges that the evidence does not meet the required standard, the judgment of involuntary commitment must be reversed.
Reasoning: The state agrees, acknowledging that the evidence does not meet the clear and convincing standard required for involuntary commitment. Consequently, the judgment is reversed.
Standard of Proof for Involuntary Commitmentsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The state must provide clear and convincing evidence that an individual poses a danger to themselves due to a mental disorder to justify involuntary commitment.
Reasoning: She contends that there is insufficient evidence to prove she poses a danger to herself due to a mental disorder.