You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Tulsa Energy, Inc. v. KPL Production Co.

Citations: 111 F.3d 88; 1997 WL 167034Docket: Nos. 96-5125, 96-5173

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit; April 9, 1997; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this appellate case, KPL Production Company appeals two district court orders concerning statutory interest on withheld production proceeds and attorney's fees awarded to Dalco Petroleum, Inc. The central issue revolves around whether KPL owes interest on proceeds withheld due to a title dispute under the Oklahoma Production Revenue Standards Act, which mandates interest accrual unless the title is unmarketable. The bankruptcy and district courts initially ruled that interest could not be waived, referencing Oklahoma case law supporting timely payment of production proceeds. However, the appellate court reverses this decision, clarifying that while 12% interest cannot be waived as it serves a penal purpose, the 6% interest applicable to unmarketable titles can be waived. The case is remanded for further proceedings regarding unresolved issues, including attorney's fees. The court also declines KPL's motion to certify a question of state law. This decision emphasizes the statutory framework for interest accrual on withheld oil and gas production proceeds and delineates between penal and compensatory interest provisions.

Legal Issues Addressed

Judicial Review Standards in Bankruptcy Appeals

Application: The appellate court reviews the bankruptcy court's factual findings for clear error and legal conclusions de novo, ultimately reversing the lower court's decision.

Reasoning: The appellate court utilizes the same review standards as the district court, rejecting bankruptcy court findings only if clearly erroneous and reviewing legal conclusions de novo.

Public Policy on Timely Royalty Payments

Application: The court interprets Oklahoma statutes as establishing a public policy mandating timely royalty payments, with specific interest rates applied based on the marketability of the title.

Reasoning: Section 540 establishes a public policy in Oklahoma mandating timely royalty payments to interest owners from oil and gas sales.

Statutory Interest on Withheld Production Proceeds

Application: The court examines whether KPL owes statutory interest on proceeds withheld due to a title dispute, concluding that such interest cannot be waived by private agreement under the Production Revenue Standards Act.

Reasoning: Both the bankruptcy and district courts ruled that this division order's waiver of interest was invalid under Oklahoma’s Production Revenue Standards Act, which mandates interest accrual on unpaid proceeds—12% per annum unless the title is unmarketable, in which case the interest rate is 6%.

Waiver of Interest Under Oklahoma Law

Application: The court considers the validity of waivers of statutory interest, determining that while 12% interest cannot be waived, the 6% interest for unmarketable title may be waived under Oklahoma law.

Reasoning: The Oklahoma statutes allow parties to waive the six percent interest, and no public policy prevents such waivers in division orders.