You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 48 v. Oregon Steel Mills, Inc.

Citations: 180 Or. App. 265; 44 P.3d 600; 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 468Docket: 9704-02954; A101903

Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon; March 19, 2002; Oregon; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. sought to clarify the effective date of an appellate judgment to ensure the timely filing of a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. The court had initially assumed no opposition to the motion, but upon learning otherwise, vacated its prior decision and reassessed the arguments. The plaintiffs requested reassignment to a different panel or en banc consideration, which was denied. The court confirmed that the appellate judgment, effective when entered and mailed, is the pivotal event for certiorari filing timelines under 28 USC section 2101(c). The defendant interpreted the denial of a motion by the U.S. Supreme Court as a misinterpretation of Oregon procedural law. The court clarified that the appellate judgment was effective on June 19, 2001, and directed the State Court Administrator to reissue it nunc pro tunc. This decision underscores the appellate judgment's role in Oregon law and resolves confusion about its timing, ensuring alignment with statutory and procedural standards. The court's ruling aimed to facilitate the defendant's pursuit of federal review while maintaining the integrity of Oregon's judicial processes.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appellate Judgment Effective Date Clarification

Application: The court clarified the effective date of the appellate judgment to assist the defendant in filing a timely petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Reasoning: The Court has the authority to recall the appellate judgment to clarify the judgment's meaning and effect, as supported by ORS 19.270(6)(a).

Interpretation of Statutory Provisions

Application: The court clarified that the appellate judgment includes enforceable provisions and clarifies any misinterpretations regarding its role and timing under Oregon law.

Reasoning: The appellate judgment reflects the appellate court's prior decision, as established by statutory requirements.

Jurisdiction and Timing of Appellate Judgments

Application: The court determined that the appellate judgment is effective upon being entered in the appellate register and mailed to the originating court, which is crucial for determining the timeliness of filing a certiorari petition.

Reasoning: The appellate judgment takes effect when it is entered in the appellate register and mailed to the originating court, as stated in ORS 19.450(2).

Role of Appellate Judgment in Oregon Law

Application: The appellate judgment replaces the mandate and is considered effective for enforcement of decisions, aligning with Oregon procedures and statutory requirements.

Reasoning: The appellate judgment now serves the role previously held by the mandate, as established in Oregon law.