You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Southern Oregon Neurological Associates v. EBI Companies

Citations: 104 Or. App. 225; 799 P.2d 1137; 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 1486Docket: WCB 88-06320; CA A49901

Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon; November 6, 1990; Oregon; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, a petitioner contested a final order from the Workers’ Compensation Department regarding compensation for testimony provided in a hearing. Dr. Maukonen, the petitioner, was subpoenaed to testify in a workers’ compensation case and submitted a bill for his services, which was significantly reduced by EBI Companies, the compensation plan administrator. The dispute centered on whether travel expenses should be reimbursed as part of 'medical services' as defined by the applicable rules and whether the standard fee schedule should apply to Dr. Maukonen's testimony fees. The Workers’ Compensation Board referee concluded that travel expenses are not reimbursable under the statutory subpoena law or relevant CPT codes, and that medical testimony fees are governed by a set fee schedule, not private agreements. The petitioner also faced a jurisdictional challenge from EBI due to procedural service issues, but the court found that such issues do not justify dismissal absent prejudice. Ultimately, the referee’s decision to award reduced fees, excluding travel expenses, was affirmed, reinforcing the application of standardized fee schedules and statutory interpretations in workers’ compensation cases.

Legal Issues Addressed

Jurisdiction and Service in Administrative Appeals

Application: Dismissal of the petition for review is unwarranted despite service defects, as such defects are non-jurisdictional if no prejudice is shown, aligning with the precedent set in Hill v. Employment Division.

Reasoning: However, service on all parties, while mandatory, is not jurisdictional under the APA, and dismissal is not justified in the absence of prejudice, as established in Hill v. Employment Division.

Travel Expenses in Workers' Compensation Cases

Application: The referee ruled that travel expenses for subpoenaed testimony do not qualify as 'medical services' and are not covered by statutory subpoena law or CPT codes.

Reasoning: The referee noted that witness fees and mileage in workers’ compensation cases are governed by civil action standards and that Dr. Maukonen’s travel-related costs were not covered under the statutory subpoena law or the CPT codes.

Workers' Compensation Fees for Medical Testimony

Application: The referee determined that medical service rules dictate the payment amount for testimony fees in workers' compensation cases, rejecting fees beyond the set schedule.

Reasoning: The referee ordered EBI to pay $1,326.72, which included $150.96 per hour for hearing attendance and $270 for preparation time, but denied the claimed travel expenses.