Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Soga v. Zimmerman
Citations: 100 Or. App. 363; 786 P.2d 221Docket: 87-CV-213; CA A49864
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon; January 30, 1990; Oregon; State Appellate Court
Respondent has petitioned for attorney fees under ORS 20.105 following the decision in Soga v. Zimmerman. The respondent claims that the Defendant-Appellant pursued the appeal in bad faith or for oppressive reasons. The court denies the petition, referencing Tyler v. Hartford Insurance Group, which establishes that while ORS 20.105 does not explicitly require findings on the record, such findings are necessary for reviewing attorney fee awards. The court notes that the petition lacks sufficient factual basis, providing only a conclusory statement, which is inadequate for a determination under ORS 20.105. The petition for attorney fees is denied.