You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Briles Wing & Helicopters, Inc. v. Marsh & McLennan, Inc.

Citations: 76 Or. App. 411; 709 P.2d 746Docket: A8306-03690; CA A34095

Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon; November 19, 1985; Oregon; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, the plaintiff leased an engine to a company, Pacific Helicopters, Inc., which had preexisting security interests held by Northwest Acceptance Corporation and U.S. Bancorp Industrial Finance, Inc. in the helicopter. Pacific failed to secure additional insurance for the engine's replacement value due to alleged negligence by its insurance broker, Marsh, McLennan. After a helicopter crash, the plaintiff sought a ruling that the insurance proceeds belonged to him and pursued damages against Marsh, McLennan, while Northwest and U.S. Bancorp counterclaimed for the proceeds. The trial court ruled in favor of Northwest and U.S. Bancorp, determining that the plaintiff was not entitled to the proceeds under an equitable lien theory, as the insurance policy predated the engine lease and did not name the plaintiff as an insured. The court issued a final judgment regarding the claims against Northwest and U.S. Bancorp, despite other unresolved claims against Marsh, McLennan. The appellate court affirmed the trial court’s decision and certification of finality under ORCP 67B, noting that the specific facts did not meet the criteria for the equitable lien rule. Additionally, Northwest's request for a penalty under ORS 19.160 was denied due to insufficient grounds.

Legal Issues Addressed

Denial of Penalty under ORS 19.160

Application: Northwest's request for a penalty against the plaintiff was denied due to the absence of grounds justifying such an assessment.

Reasoning: Finally, Northwest’s request for a penalty against the plaintiff under ORS 19.160 is denied due to lack of grounds for such an assessment.

Equitable Lien on Insurance Proceeds

Application: The court determined that the plaintiff was not entitled to an equitable lien on insurance proceeds because the lease did not result in the plaintiff being named as an insured under the preexisting policy.

Reasoning: Plaintiff asserts a right to insurance proceeds from a policy that was in effect prior to leasing an engine to Pacific and before Pacific committed to securing insurance for the plaintiff.

Final Judgment under ORCP 67B

Application: The court upheld the trial court's certification of finality regarding the judgment on claims against Northwest and U.S. Bancorp, even though other issues in the case remained unresolved.

Reasoning: The court confirms it cannot challenge the trial court’s certification of finality under ORCP 67B, provided the judgment adjudicates an issue.

Security Interests in After-Acquired Property

Application: Disputes remained unresolved concerning the extent of Northwest’s and U.S. Bancorp’s security interests in the after-acquired engine and their entitlement to insurance proceeds from its loss.

Reasoning: Disputes exist regarding the extent of Northwest’s and U.S. Bancorp’s security interests in the after-acquired engine and their entitlement to insurance proceeds from the engine's loss.