You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Moore v. Commodore Corp.

Citations: 55 Or. App. 480; 638 P.2d 491; 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2240Docket: WCB. Nos. 79-11,081, 80-221, CA A20410

Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon; January 5, 1982; Oregon; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this workers' compensation case, the claimant appealed the Workers' Compensation Board's order affirming the denial of her claims by two insurance companies. The claimant, employed in a physically demanding role, initially filed a claim in April 1978 for pain in her elbow, wrist, and shoulder, leading to treatment and carpal tunnel release surgery. Despite returning to work, her shoulder pain persisted, resulting in a second claim filed in November 1979, which the insurer denied as an aggravation of the prior injury. The Board ruled that the claimant proved the compensability of her November 1979 claim, identifying the shoulder condition as an aggravation of the initial injury requiring further assessment of her disability extent. The court found sufficient medical verification for interim compensation and determined that the insurer's delayed response warranted penalties and attorney fees under ORS 656.262(5). Moreover, the claimant's pain syndrome was deemed compensable, with potential liability for additional penalties due to unreasonable payment delays as per ORS 656.262(8). The decision was thus reversed and remanded for further proceedings, including awarding interim compensation, penalties, and attorney fees.

Legal Issues Addressed

Compensability of Pain as a Work-Related Condition

Application: The Board acknowledged that the claimant's pain syndrome, in the context of her work-related injuries, was compensable despite the lack of a precise anatomical diagnosis.

Reasoning: Although the referee denied the claim on the basis that 'pain is not an injury or condition,' it is acknowledged that the disabling effects of pain can be evaluated in the context of any injury.

Liability for Unreasonable Delay in Payment under ORS 656.262(8)

Application: If there is an unreasonable delay or refusal to pay compensation, the insurer may be liable for an additional amount up to 25% of the owed amounts, plus attorney fees.

Reasoning: According to ORS 656.262(8), if there is unreasonable delay or refusal to pay compensation, the employer or insurer may be liable for an additional amount up to 25% of the owed amounts, plus any attorney fees under ORS 656.382.

Penalties and Attorney Fees for Delayed Claim Response under ORS 656.262(5)

Application: The claimant was entitled to penalties and attorney fees due to Truckers' failure to respond within the statutory 60-day period after the claim was filed, which was not denied until March 1980.

Reasoning: The claimant also sought penalties and attorney fees for Truckers' failure to respond to her claim within 60 days after her employer received notice, as stipulated by ORS 656.262(5).

Requirement for Interim Compensation under ORS 656.272(6)

Application: The insurer, Truckers, was found liable for interim compensation due to failing to respond timely to the notice of the claimant’s worsened condition, as verified by Dr. Fleshman's correspondence.

Reasoning: The claimant sought interim compensation due to Truckers' untimely denial of the claim. Under ORS 656.272(6), insurers must pay interim compensation within 14 days of being notified of a worsened condition.

Workers' Compensation for Aggravation of Previous Injuries

Application: The Board concluded that the shoulder condition was a compensable aggravation of the claimant's April 1978 injury, necessitating a remand to assess the extent of disability.

Reasoning: The issue of whether this condition was an aggravation of the previous injury or a new injury was addressed, concluding it was a compensable aggravation of the April condition, with a remand for the Board to assess the extent of disability.