Narrative Opinion Summary
Upon remand from the Supreme Court, the Court has published its order dated October 22, 1993, regarding a petition for review of a Federal Communications Commission order. Following the review of supplemental briefs from the parties, the Court has dismissed the petition for review. The dismissal is based on the determination that there is no justification for applying a heightened scrutiny standard as argued by the petitioners, leading to the conclusion that no significant legal issues remain for consideration. The Clerk is instructed to withhold the issuance of the mandate for seven days following any timely petition for rehearing, in accordance with D.C. Circuit Rule 15.
Legal Issues Addressed
Dismissal of Petition for Reviewsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court dismissed the petition for review upon determining that there is no justification for applying a heightened scrutiny standard.
Reasoning: Following the review of supplemental briefs from the parties, the Court has dismissed the petition for review.
Issuance of Mandatesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court directed the Clerk to withhold the mandate for a specified period following a petition for rehearing, in compliance with procedural rules.
Reasoning: The Clerk is instructed to withhold the issuance of the mandate for seven days following any timely petition for rehearing, in accordance with D.C. Circuit Rule 15.
Standard of Reviewsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court concluded that no heightened scrutiny standard is required, which was a central argument by the petitioners.
Reasoning: The dismissal is based on the determination that there is no justification for applying a heightened scrutiny standard as argued by the petitioners.