You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

United States v. Thermon Phillips, E.B. Rich, Usx Corporation A/K/A United States Steel Corporation

Citations: 59 F.3d 1095; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25925; 1995 WL 410308Docket: 90-7721

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit; July 12, 1995; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this appellate case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reviewed an appeal involving defendants Thermon Phillips, E.B. Rich, and USX Corporation against the United States, emanating from the Northern District of Alabama. Presided over by Judge E.B. Haltom, Jr., the case necessitated a correction in the court's 1994 opinion regarding the miscitation of legal sections. Specifically, the court amended several instances of '1108' to '1028,' and clarified the distinct purposes of sections 1131 and 1028. The clarification involved the interpretation of 'willfully' in section 1131 as indicative of voluntary action rather than accidental, and the definition of defenses under section 1028 in line with the 'prudent man' standard. The court's decision underscores its commitment to accurate legal interpretation and highlights the roles of various legal representatives, including those of the defendants, appellee, and an amicus curiae from the Chamber of Commerce. The ruling resolved the clerical discrepancies, ensuring the precision of legal citations and statutory interpretations.

Legal Issues Addressed

Clerical Error Correction in Judicial Opinions

Application: The court addressed and corrected a clerical error in a previously published opinion by amending the citation of legal sections.

Reasoning: The court issued an order amending a previously published opinion from 1994, correcting a clerical error regarding the citation of legal sections.

Interpretation of 'Willfully' in Legal Statutes

Application: The court clarified that 'willfully,' as used in section 1131, refers to voluntary action rather than accidental conduct.

Reasoning: The amended interpretation emphasizes that 'willfully,' as used in section 1131, indicates voluntary action rather than accidental conduct.

Scope of Defenses under Legal Statutes

Application: The court explained that section 1028 outlines the scope of defenses aligned with the 'prudent man' standard established by Congress.

Reasoning: Section 1028 outlines the scope of defenses aligned with the 'prudent man' standard established by Congress.