You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Wwsm Investors, Dba Advanced Plastics Engineering Co., Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Plaintiff-Appellee

Citations: 56 F.3d 1053; 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4007; 95 Daily Journal DAR 6893; 75 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2615; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 13245; 1995 WL 322655Docket: 93-17072

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; May 31, 1995; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In the case of WWSM Investors, doing business as Advanced Plastics Engineering Co., versus the United States of America, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed a legal dispute involving the plaintiff’s counterclaims against the federal government. The case was argued with submissions deferred initially on April 4, 1995, and later resubmitted on May 17, 1995, culminating in a decision on May 31, 1995. However, it is important to note that the court has since withdrawn its opinion regarding this case. The document references the case number 93-17072 and indicates involvement in tax-related matters, as seen in the A.F.T.R. citation, but further details regarding the specifics of the claims, defenses, or the basis for the withdrawal are not provided in this summary.

Legal Issues Addressed

Federal Court Jurisdiction over Tax Disputes

Application: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the plaintiff’s counterclaims against the federal government, indicating the court's jurisdiction over such disputes.

Reasoning: In the case of WWSM Investors, doing business as Advanced Plastics Engineering Co., versus the United States of America, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed a legal dispute involving the plaintiff’s counterclaims against the federal government.

Withdrawal of Court Opinion

Application: The court withdrew its opinion in the case, indicating that the initial decision or analysis was retracted for unspecified reasons.

Reasoning: However, it is important to note that the court has since withdrawn its opinion regarding this case.