Narrative Opinion Summary
Candela Laser Corporation and Gaelis Corporation, the plaintiffs-appellants, filed an appeal against Cynosure, Inc., the defendant-appellee, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The case number is 94-1514, and the judgment was rendered on May 11, 1995, by Circuit Judges Rich, Lourie, and Rader. The court affirmed the lower court's decision without providing a detailed opinion, as indicated by the use of Fed. Cir. R. 36. Additionally, the document includes a notice about the non-precedential nature of the opinion, stating that it cannot be cited as precedent, though it allows for the assertion of certain legal doctrines based on nonprecedential decisions.
Legal Issues Addressed
Assertion of Legal Doctrines from Non-Precedential Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: While the opinion is non-precedential, it permits the assertion of certain legal doctrines based on nonprecedential decisions.
Reasoning: Though it allows for the assertion of certain legal doctrines based on nonprecedential decisions.
Non-Precedential Opinionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The opinion issued by the court in this case was non-precedential, meaning it cannot be cited as precedent in future cases.
Reasoning: Additionally, the document includes a notice about the non-precedential nature of the opinion, stating that it cannot be cited as precedent.
Use of Rule 36 in Appealssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court used Rule 36 to affirm the lower court's decision without issuing a detailed opinion.
Reasoning: The court affirmed the lower court's decision without providing a detailed opinion, as indicated by the use of Fed. Cir. R. 36.