You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Douglas G. Housley v. Rodney Hageman Malcom Harris, Richard Stolitz, Anthony L. White, William Maddox and Charles Lutz

Citations: 56 F.3d 71; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19856Docket: 94-15421

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; May 16, 1995; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The document pertains to the case Douglas G. Housley v. Rodney Hageman et al., with the case number 94-15421, presented before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The submission date was May 16, 1995. Notably, the court has withdrawn the opinion previously issued in this case. Additionally, it references Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3, which states that non-published dispositions lack precedential value and should not be cited, except in specific legal circumstances such as the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Legal Issues Addressed

Precedential Value of Non-Published Dispositions

Application: Under Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3, the opinion in this case, being non-published, cannot be cited as precedent except in specific legal doctrines.

Reasoning: Additionally, it references Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3, which states that non-published dispositions lack precedential value and should not be cited, except in specific legal circumstances such as the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Withdrawal of Judicial Opinion

Application: The court decided to withdraw the previously issued opinion for this case, indicating a change or reconsideration in the court's stance or findings.

Reasoning: Notably, the court has withdrawn the opinion previously issued in this case.