Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Ricky Lee Jenkins v. Howard Wayne Davis Cheryl Higgins James L. Hope Wanda Faye Jenkins
Citations: 56 F.3d 61; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19095; 1995 WL 323860Docket: 95-6332
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; May 31, 1995; Federal Appellate Court
Ricky Lee Jenkins, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court's denial of his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, finding no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's decision, specifically referencing Jenkins v. Davis, No. CA-95-76-R (W.D.Va. Jan 31, 1995). The panel, consisting of Judges Widener, Wilkinson, and Wilkins, determined that oral argument was unnecessary as the case facts and legal arguments were sufficiently clear in the submitted materials, resulting in the denial of the motion for oral argument.