You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

United States of America v. Hosie Simmons, Jr.

Citations: 54 F.3d 777; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17716; 1995 WL 293897Docket: 94-5889

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit; May 12, 1995; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the district court in the case of United States v. Hosie Simmons, Jr., indicating that after reviewing the record, briefs, and oral arguments, no prejudicial errors were found in the lower court's proceedings. The ruling was delivered by a panel consisting of Circuit Judges Suhrheinrich and Daughtry, along with District Judge Zatkoff, who was sitting by designation. The decision was rendered on May 12, 1995. Additionally, the document notes that citation of unpublished dispositions is generally disfavored except for specific legal purposes, such as establishing res judicata or the law of the case.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appellate Review of Lower Court Proceedings

Application: The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals conducted a review of the district court's proceedings and found no prejudicial errors, thus affirming the judgment.

Reasoning: The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the district court in the case of United States v. Hosie Simmons, Jr., indicating that after reviewing the record, briefs, and oral arguments, no prejudicial errors were found in the lower court's proceedings.

Citation of Unpublished Dispositions

Application: The case highlights that citing unpublished dispositions is generally discouraged except for certain legal purposes such as establishing res judicata or the law of the case.

Reasoning: Additionally, the document notes that citation of unpublished dispositions is generally disfavored except for specific legal purposes, such as establishing res judicata or the law of the case.

Composition of Appellate Panel

Application: The decision was made by a panel consisting of two Circuit Judges and a District Judge sitting by designation, which is a common practice in appellate courts.

Reasoning: The ruling was delivered by a panel consisting of Circuit Judges Suhrheinrich and Daughtry, along with District Judge Zatkoff, who was sitting by designation.