Narrative Opinion Summary
The court has identified a conflict in legal interpretations and has consolidated the cases of Walker v. Toledo and Jodka v. Cleveland for review. The order certifying the conflict is affirmed, and the briefing schedule for the consolidated cases is temporarily stayed. Justice Kennedy and Justice French dissent on specific issues, while Justice O'Donnell is not participating in the decision.
Legal Issues Addressed
Conflict of Legal Interpretationssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court addresses a conflict in legal interpretations by consolidating cases for review.
Reasoning: The court has identified a conflict in legal interpretations and has consolidated the cases of Walker v. Toledo and Jodka v. Cleveland for review.
Judicial Dissentsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Justice Kennedy and Justice French express dissent on specific issues within the case.
Reasoning: Justice Kennedy and Justice French dissent on specific issues, while Justice O'Donnell is not participating in the decision.
Order Certifying Conflictsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court affirms the order certifying the conflict between the consolidated cases.
Reasoning: The order certifying the conflict is affirmed, and the briefing schedule for the consolidated cases is temporarily stayed.