You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Janosek v. Janosek

Citations: 127 Ohio St. 3d 1424; 936 N.E.2d 72Docket: 2009-1705

Court: Ohio Supreme Court; November 1, 2010; Ohio; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

Cuyahoga App. No. 91882, 2009-Ohio-3882 involves an appeal pending before the court from the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals. The court granted the appellant's motion for leave to correct a misstatement made during oral argument. This motion is considered adequate notice of the error, and no additional filings are necessary.

Legal Issues Addressed

Adequate Notice of Error

Application: A motion for leave to correct a misstatement is sufficient to notify the court of the error without requiring additional filings.

Reasoning: This motion is considered adequate notice of the error, and no additional filings are necessary.

Correction of Misstatements During Oral Argument

Application: The court allows parties to correct misstatements made during oral arguments by granting motions considered as adequate notice of errors.

Reasoning: The court granted the appellant's motion for leave to correct a misstatement made during oral argument.