You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

United States v. Evaristo Hinojosa, Sr., Daniel Inocencio and Daniel Alfonso Reyes

Citations: 48 F.3d 163; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4989; 1995 WL 106196Docket: 93-7514

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit; March 14, 1995; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the case of United States v. Evaristo Hinojosa, Sr., Daniel Inocencio, and Daniel Alfonso Reyes. The appeal followed a decision from the Southern District of Texas, presided over by Judge George P. Kazen. The court had previously stayed the issuance of the mandate for Daniel Alfonso Reyes to allow for a review of the sentencing transcript. Upon examining the transcript, the court concluded that the district court correctly enhanced Reyes' sentence due to his obstruction of justice. Consequently, the appellate court affirmed Reyes' sentence and ordered the Clerk to issue the mandate for him.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appellate Review of Sentencing Enhancements

Application: The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals assessed whether the district court correctly enhanced Reyes' sentence based on obstruction of justice.

Reasoning: Upon examining the transcript, the court concluded that the district court correctly enhanced Reyes' sentence due to his obstruction of justice.

Issuance of Mandate Post-Appellate Review

Application: After affirming the district court's decision on the sentencing enhancement, the appellate court directed the issuance of the mandate for Daniel Alfonso Reyes.

Reasoning: Consequently, the appellate court affirmed Reyes' sentence and ordered the Clerk to issue the mandate for him.