Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Hammock v. Cincinnati Insurance
Citations: 102 Ohio St. 3d 1232; 809 N.E.2d 669Docket: No. 2003-1972
Court: Ohio Supreme Court; June 16, 2004; Ohio; State Supreme Court
Lundberg Stratton, J. concurs with the decision to deny reconsideration of the case. He reiterates his position from a previous concurring opinion in Fish v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co., asserting that the ruling in Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis is applicable to all pending cases involving claims raised under Scott-Pontzer v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. The appellate court has remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings, which must include the application of the Galatis decision. Attorneys Kohnen, Patton, L.L.P. and Colleen M. Blandford represent the appellant, while O’Donnell, J. also concurs with the concurring opinion.