You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. Robinette

Citations: 97 Ohio St. 3d 1499; 780 N.E.2d 1023Docket: 2002-1841

Court: Ohio Supreme Court; December 30, 2002; Ohio; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In the case Franklin App. No. 01AP-1319, 2002-Ohio-4777, the court is addressing an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. The appellant filed a motion to stay the briefing schedule in order to pursue a settlement under Supreme Court Practice Rule XIV(6XC). The court has granted this motion, allowing the appellant to file their brief by January 29, 2003.

Legal Issues Addressed

Grant of Motion for Stay

Application: In this case, the court granted the appellant's motion, setting a new deadline for filing the brief, which underscores the court's discretion in managing case timelines to accommodate settlement efforts.

Reasoning: The court has granted this motion, allowing the appellant to file their brief by January 29, 2003.

Motion to Stay Briefing Schedule

Application: The court allows the appellant to delay the briefing schedule to pursue a settlement, demonstrating that under certain circumstances, the court can grant a stay to facilitate settlement discussions.

Reasoning: The appellant filed a motion to stay the briefing schedule in order to pursue a settlement under Supreme Court Practice Rule XIV(6XC).