You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Gen. Motors Corp. v. Joe O'Brien Chevrolet, Inc.

Citations: 79 Ohio St. 3d 1401; 679 N.E.2d 718; 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3935Docket: 97-759

Court: Ohio Supreme Court; May 29, 1997; Ohio; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In the matter of Franklin App. No. 96APE06-779, the court is addressing a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. On May 15, 1997, the appellees submitted a memorandum in response according to S.Ct. Prac.R. III(2)(D). Following this, on May 16, 1997, the appellees requested an order to permit the filing of their memorandum in response to a memorandum supporting jurisdiction filed by amici curiae. The court considered this request and denied the motion.

Legal Issues Addressed

Denial of Motion for Filing Memoranda

Application: The court denied the appellees' motion requesting permission to file their memorandum in response, illustrating the court's discretion in managing procedural requests.

Reasoning: The court considered this request and denied the motion.

Discretionary Appeal Procedures

Application: The court reviewed a discretionary appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, highlighting the procedural aspects involved in such appeals.

Reasoning: In the matter of Franklin App. No. 96APE06-779, the court is addressing a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County.

Filing of Memoranda in Response

Application: The appellees attempted to file a memorandum in response to a memorandum supporting jurisdiction filed by amici curiae, demonstrating the procedural steps parties may take in appeal cases.

Reasoning: On May 15, 1997, the appellees submitted a memorandum in response according to S.Ct. Prac.R. III(2)(D).