You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

State v. Mays

Citation: 69 Ohio St. 3d 1493Docket: 94-1174

Court: Ohio Supreme Court; January 14, 1994; Ohio; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

Cuyahoga County, No. 67262 is currently under discretionary appeal. The court has denied the appellant's emergency motion to advance the case on the docket. Judges Sweeney, Wright, and Pfeifer dissented from this decision. Additionally, the court has set bail pending appeal at $100,000, with Chief Justice Moyer and Justices Douglas and Resnick dissenting from this bail decision.

Legal Issues Addressed

Discretionary Appeal Proceedings

Application: The court has the authority to decide whether to advance a case on the docket during a discretionary appeal.

Reasoning: The court has denied the appellant's emergency motion to advance the case on the docket.

Judicial Dissent in Bail Decision

Application: Dissenting opinions may arise regarding the court's decision on bail pending appeal.

Reasoning: Chief Justice Moyer and Justices Douglas and Resnick dissented from this bail decision.

Judicial Dissent in Denial of Motion

Application: Judges may express dissenting opinions when a court denies a motion related to the management of appellate cases.

Reasoning: Judges Sweeney, Wright, and Pfeifer dissented from this decision.

Setting of Bail Pending Appeal

Application: The court determines the amount of bail pending appeal, which in this case was set at $100,000.

Reasoning: Additionally, the court has set bail pending appeal at $100,000.