Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Bar Ass'n of Greater Cleveland v. Bogomolny
Citations: 10 Ohio St. 3d 110; 10 Ohio B. 435; 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1074; 461 N.E.2d 1294Docket: D.D. No. 83-24
Court: Ohio Supreme Court; April 17, 1984; Ohio; State Supreme Court
A finding of guilty on two counts of violating the Sherman Act is deemed misconduct under Disciplinary Rules DR 1-102(A)(3) and (A)(4). The respondent's nolo contendere plea does not mitigate the violation of these rules. After reviewing evidence and objections submitted by the respondent, the court confirms that the respondent, Richard Joseph Bogomolny, violated the specified Disciplinary Rules. The court agrees with the board of commissioners' recommendation for disciplinary action. Consequently, Richard Joseph Bogomolny is indefinitely suspended from practicing law. The judgment is unanimously concurred by the judges.