You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Ervin v. Turner

Citations: 35 N.C. App. 265; 241 S.E.2d 132; 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2940Docket: No. 7719DC234

Court: Court of Appeals of North Carolina; February 7, 1978; North Carolina; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

Summary judgment for the feme defendant, Beth M. Turner, was deemed improper as plaintiffs raised a genuine issue of material fact regarding her involvement in the contract with Baxter E. Turner for house construction. A valid contract requires a meeting of minds on all essential terms. The case differs from Leffew v. Orrell, where no agreement on contract price or payment terms was established. Here, essential terms, including services and costs, were documented in a "Detail Estimate" attached to the pleadings. Affidavits indicated that all construction phases, materials, costs, and workmanship were discussed and agreed upon. The trial court's decision to strike the notice of claim of lien and grant summary judgment for the feme defendant was reversed, and the case was remanded for further proceedings. Judges Britt and Webb concurred with the decision.

Legal Issues Addressed

Contract Formation Requirements

Application: The presence of a 'Detail Estimate' demonstrated that there was a meeting of minds on essential terms, differing from prior case law.

Reasoning: A valid contract requires a meeting of minds on all essential terms. The case differs from Leffew v. Orrell, where no agreement on contract price or payment terms was established.

Documentation of Contract Terms

Application: The 'Detail Estimate' attached to the pleadings documented the essential terms of services and costs, supporting the existence of a contract.

Reasoning: Here, essential terms, including services and costs, were documented in a 'Detail Estimate' attached to the pleadings.

Reversal of Trial Court's Decision

Application: The trial court's decision to strike the notice of claim of lien and grant summary judgment was reversed, necessitating further proceedings.

Reasoning: The trial court's decision to strike the notice of claim of lien and grant summary judgment for the feme defendant was reversed, and the case was remanded for further proceedings.

Summary Judgment Standards

Application: Summary judgment was found to be improper as there was a genuine issue of material fact regarding the feme defendant's involvement in the contract.

Reasoning: Summary judgment for the feme defendant, Beth M. Turner, was deemed improper as plaintiffs raised a genuine issue of material fact regarding her involvement in the contract with Baxter E. Turner for house construction.